Showing posts with label boys. Show all posts
Showing posts with label boys. Show all posts

Thursday, June 11, 2015

More than 13% of boys in America have ADHD

This article claims that over 13% of American boys have ADHD.

A total of 9.5% of children aged 4-17 in the US have at some point been diagnosed with ADHD, according to statistics from the US Centers for Disease Control. While prevalence statistics often rely on the administration of mental health screening tests, the latest statistics reflect actual diagnoses given to the children by physicians or mental health care providers. The CDC also identified significant trends based on gender and income levels.
The latest statistics came from the National Health Interview Survey of the National Center for Health Statistics. Between 2011-13, information was collected for 29,968 children aged 4–17. Respondents were asked, “Has a doctor or health professional ever told you that [sample child] had attention deficit hyperactivity disorder (ADHD) or attention deficit disorder (ADD)?”
There were differences based on age, gender and income.
"For those aged 4–5, prevalence was 2.7%, 9.5% for those aged 6–11, and 11.8% for those aged 12–17," stated a CDC data brief. "13.3% of boys and 5.6% of girls aged 4–17 had ever been diagnosed with ADHD."
The ADHD rates were highest among children with public insurance at 11.7%, and lowest among uninsured children at 5.7%. Among children with private insurance, the rate was 8.6%.
Of families with incomes below 200% of the federal poverty threshold, 10.4% of children had been diagnosed with ADHD, compared with 8.8% of children in families with incomes at or above 200% of the poverty threshold.
Read more here

Tuesday, May 19, 2015

Study: Girls diagnosed with autism later than boys are

A study shows that girls are diagnosed with autism later than boys are.


Current statistics on autism spectrum disorder (ASD) show that boys are nearly five times more likely than girls to have autism. Now a new study proves that in addition to being diagnosed less, girls are also diagnosed at a later age than boys.
The study, conducted by the Kennedy Krieger Institute in in Baltimore, Maryland, analyzed data from the Institute’s Interactive Autism Network (IAN), an online information registry of nearly 50,000 people affected by autism and their families.  Researchers took into account the age that both boys and girls were diagnosed with autism for 9,932 children, and Social Responsiveness Scale data from 5,103 children, which identifies the presence and severity of social impairment.
Results showed that girls with a type of autism called pervasive developmental disorder (PDD)— which is characterized by delays in the development of socialization and communication skills— were diagnosed at an average age of 4 years old, compared to 3.8 years old in boys. In addition to PPD diagnosis, researchers found that Asperger’s syndrome diagnoses also happened later for girls – at 7.6 years old compared to 7.1 years of age for boys.
“The later diagnosis of girls appears to be tied to their areas of delay being less apparent, showing up more as shyness and quietness rather than the more unusual behaviors seen in boys, ” Dr. Paul Lipkin, study author and director of the Interactive Autism Network at Kennedy Krieger told FoxNews.com.
Lipkin said findings suggest that when it comes to social cognition, or the ability to interpret social cues, girls struggle more than boys, while boys have more difficulty with more obvious symptoms like severe mannerisms and repetitive behaviors.
“At the present time, autism screeners are not designed to look at boys and girls differently. This and other studies suggest that such may be needed, particularly around social skill development,” Lipkin said. “So parents, pediatric clinicians, therapists, educators now should give careful consideration to girls who are having difficulties in social situations and assist these girls early.”
Researchers noted an increase in the number of girls diagnosed with autism from 2010-2013 compared to the statistic measured four years earlier. Lipkin said he thinks the reason for the rise might be better public awareness and screening methods.
“We need to look at large groups of girls with autism and better understand their developmental pathways, in order to find the best means for their early identification and to find the best treatments for the challenges they experience,” he said. “One can no longer assume that boys and girls with autism are alike.”
Lipkin said he hopes the findings help change the way autism is diagnosed, and that further research will determine whether less recognizable symptoms in girls are not only leading to later diagnosis, but also under-identification of the condition.
“We need to find the best ways to identify those at both ends of the spectrum, those with severe problems and those with milder problems in social development,” he said. “The quiet girl with social difficulties may have an ASD and may benefit from special treatments aimed at these delays in social development.”
Read more here

Thursday, September 04, 2014

Young males' brains and risky behaviors

A study gains insight into brain mechanisms that explain why young males engage in more risky behaviors.

It's common knowledge that teenage boys seem predisposed to risky behaviors. Now, a series of new studies is shedding light on specific brain mechanisms that help to explain what might be going on inside juvenile male brains.

Florida State University College of Medicine Neuroscientist Pradeep Bhide brought together some of the world's foremost researchers in a quest to explain why teenagers -- boys, in particular -- often behave erratically.
The result is a series of 19 studies that approached the question from multiple scientific domains, including psychology, neurochemistry, brain imaging, clinical neuroscience and neurobiology. The studies are published in a special volume of Developmental Neuroscience, "Teenage Brains: Think Different?"
"Psychologists, psychiatrists, educators, neuroscientists, criminal justice professionals and parents are engaged in a daily struggle to understand and solve the enigma of teenage risky behaviors," Bhide said. "Such behaviors impact not only the teenagers who obviously put themselves at serious and lasting risk but also families and societies in general.
"The emotional and economic burdens of such behaviors are quite huge. The research described in this book offers clues to what may cause such maladaptive behaviors and how one may be able to devise methods of countering, avoiding or modifying these behaviors."
An example of findings published in the book that provide new insights about the inner workings of a teenage boy's brain:
• Unlike children or adults, teenage boys show enhanced activity in the part of the brain that controls emotions when confronted with a threat. Magnetic resonance scanner readings in one study revealed that the level of activity in the limbic brain of adolescent males reacting to threat, even when they've been told not to respond to it, was strikingly different from that in adult men.
• Using brain activity measurements, another team of researchers found that teenage boys were mostly immune to the threat of punishment but hypersensitive to the possibility of large gains from gambling. The results question the effectiveness of punishment as a deterrent for risky or deviant behavior in adolescent boys.
• Another study demonstrated that a molecule known to be vital in developing fear of dangerous situations is less active in adolescent male brains. These findings point towards neurochemical differences between teenage and adult brains, which may underlie the complex behaviors exhibited by teenagers.
"The new studies illustrate the neurobiological basis of some of the more unusual but well-known behaviors exhibited by our teenagers," Bhide said. "Stress, hormonal changes, complexities of psycho-social environment and peer-pressure all contribute to the challenges of assimilation faced by teenagers.
"These studies attempt to isolate, examine and understand some of these potential causes of a teenager's complex conundrum. The research sheds light on how we may be able to better interact with teenagers at home or outside the home, how to design educational strategies and how best to treat or modify a teenager's maladaptive behavior."
Read more here

Monday, August 11, 2014

Do girl's lacrosse players need helmets

This article discusses the need for helmets in lacrosse, especially girls lacrosse which is perceived to he less of a contact sport than boy's lacrosse.

Lacrosse is one of the fastest-growing high school sports in the country. It also has one of the hottest debates regarding its rules — specifically, whether girls who play should be required to wear helmets, as boys are.
Boys lacrosse is a physical sport with heavy doses of contact. Girls lacrosse is regarded as more of a skill sport, with less contact. Players in the girls game are required to wear protective eyewear and mouth guards, but not helmets.
study recently published in The American Journal of Sports Medicine looked at the types of injuries high school lacrosse players suffer. The study, conducted by researchers from the Center of Injury Research and Policy at Nationwide's Children Hospital and the Colorado School of Public Health, evaluated injuries players suffered from 2008-12. The research found that the most common injury, at 38 percent, were sprains and strains, followed by concussions at more than 22 percent.
Dawn Comstock, a professor at the Colorado School of Public Health and one of the researchers, said the most surprising discovery was how players got concussions.
"In boys, nearly 75 percent of all of the concussions were due to athlete-athlete contact," Comstock said. "Not surprising, since boys lacrosse is a full contact sport. But girls, over 60 percent of the concussions resulted when a girl was struck in the head by a ball or the stick."
Even though girls lacrosse is regarded as a noncontact sport, researchers found that almost 25 percent of concussions came from athlete-to-athlete contact. About 63 percent of the concussions resulted from being hit in the head by a ball or a stick.
According to rules from U.S. Lacrosse, which the National Federation of State High School Associations endorses, girls may wear soft headgear but not hard helmets. Only goalies can wear helmets. Field players wear protective eyewear and mouth guards.
Denver East High School coach Mallory Cleveland would like to see helmets mandated in girls lacrosse. Cleveland played one year of lacrosse without goggles before they were required.
"At that time it was kind of a pain and people didn't like them and there was some lash out," Cleveland said. "But I would say now that it's just a part of the sport, it's something that's a given and everyone is used to them and wears them now. Helmets will definitely be the same thing once they are implemented."
Cleveland said a handful of players on the Denver East varsity and lower-level teams suffered concussions this past school year.
In June, the Florida High School Athletics Association announced that in 2015 all girls lacrosse players will be required to wear helmets.
Comstock said helmets can't eliminate concussions but can help minimize head injuries. When two players run into each other, often the head of one of the players snaps back. This results in brain sloshing, when the brain moves around inside the skull, and can result in a concussion. Comstock said a helmet can help protect against the direct transfer of force when a player gets hit in the head.
Some players and coaches worry that adding helmets will change their game. Cherry Creek assistant coach Ashley Thompson said girls lacrosse is about finesse and technical skills, not physical play. If helmets are required, she's afraid the cost might turn away interested players. Thompson added that coaches are more aware about concussions than in the past.
Denver East senior-to-be Shelby Parks said she would be upset if helmets are required to play girls lacrosse. She said she's never had a concussion and has seen only one player get a concussion during a game. Implementing helmets would make the players more aggressive, she said.
"When you're wearing a helmet or you see someone wearing a helmet, it means they're protected and anything goes," Parks said. "Lacrosse can get aggressive, but the refs are there for a reason and people shouldn't get hit in the head, because that's not a part of the game."
Read more here

Friday, June 27, 2014

More boys are diagnosed with ADD and ADHD

This article discusses an apparent gender bias which causes more boys than girls to be diagnosed with ADD and ADHD.
There's a gender bias when it comes to diagnosing Attention Deficit Disorder and Attention Deficit Hyperactivity Disorder.
That's according to the woman who runs the largest ADHD coaching program in North America.
Shanna Pearson, the founder and president of One Focus Total Success Inc., told CFRA it's because the symptoms present more clearly in men.
"It's more noticeable in men, so a lot more of them are actually going to seek a diagnosis or it's just being pointed out to them," she said. "With women a lot of them, it's just going under the wire. They're not being noticed. They're not picking up on it."
Research shows two out of every three women with ADD or ADHD are misdiagnosed by doctors as having depression.
"And it's almost understandable how they would, because a lot of ADHD symptoms, especially for women because it's more on the emotional spectrum, a lot of ADHD symptoms can look like depression," she said.
She said women need to be aware about what is going on for them.
"It's not necessarily that they're just overly emotional or very scattered or absent-minded or some of the other labels that people put on women who are like that," Pearson said.
"It could be that they have ADHD, so I would say that if you're a woman who has more drama in your life than most people you know, if you're somebody who gets overwhelmed very, very easily or you experience a lot of anxiety on a regular basis or you tend to get frozen in your thoughts or overwhelmed and you can't move forward - those types of symptoms, I would say you might want to get a diagnosis," she added.
Pearson said once a person is properly diagnosed by a specialist, they can learn how to better manage the symptoms that come with the disorder.
Read more here

Friday, April 25, 2014

Girls suffer worse concussions than boys do

A study looked into how gender affects concussion and showed that girls suffer worse concussions than boys do.

Girls who suffer a concussion may have more severe symptoms that last longer compared to boys, according to new research that builds on other studies finding gender differences.
"There have been several studies suggesting there are differences between boys and girls as far as [concussion] symptom reporting and the duration of symptoms," said Dr. Shayne Fehr, a pediatric sports medicine specialist at Children's Hospital of Wisconsin.
In his new study, Fehr also found those differences. He tracked 549 patients, including 235 girls, who sought treatment at a pediatric concussion clinic.
Compared to the boys, the girls reported more severe symptoms and took nearly 22 more days to recover, said Fehr, also an assistant professor of pediatric orthopedics at the Medical College of Wisconsin.
He was due to present the findings this week at the annual meeting of the American Medical Society for Sports Medicine, held in New Orleans. Studies presented at medical meetings are typically viewed as preliminary until published in a peer-reviewed journal.
A concussion is any brain injury that disturbs normal functioning. Concussions are typically caused by a jolt or blow to the head, often in collision sports such as hockey or football, according to the American Academy of Pediatrics (AAP).
In recent years, experts have advised coaches, players and parents that athletes should not return to play until they are seen by a doctor if a concussion is suspected.
In the new study, Fehr tracked patients aged 10 to 18, all treated between early 2010 and mid-2012. Each patient reported on their symptoms, how severe they were and how long it took from the time of the injury until they were symptom-free.
In addition to reporting more severe symptoms, girls took an average of 56 days to be symptom-free. In comparison, the boys took 34 days. Overall, the time to recovery was 44 days when boys and girls were pooled.
That duration of symptoms, Fehr said, is much longer than what people commonly think. "Commonly you hear that seven to 10 days [for recovery] is average," he said.
Fehr did not find age to be linked with severity of symptoms. Most of the injuries -- 76 percent -- were sports-related, with football accounting for 22 percent of the concussions.
The top five reported symptoms were headache, trouble concentrating, sensitivity to light, sensitivity to sound and dizziness. Boys and girls, in general, reported the same types of symptoms, Fehr said, but the girls reported more severity and for a longer time period.
"This confirms what has been reported before," said Dr. John Kuluz, director of traumatic brain injury and neurorehabilitation at Miami Children's Hospital, who reviewed the findings.
While he said the 44-day recovery seems lengthy, he added that it probably reflects the boys and girls studied. They all went to a concussion clinic, so their injuries may have been more severe.
What's not known, Fehr said, is why the differences exist and whether they are related to more reporting of symptoms right after the injury by girls or if girls are truly more significantly affected.
"I wouldn't treat girls any differently than boys,'' he said.
For both genders, it's important to be seen by a doctor and not return to play prematurely, which can be dangerous or even fatal, according to the AAP. Anyone with a history of concussion is at higher risk for another injury.
Read more here

Monday, April 14, 2014

Increase in autism diagnosis rates since 2000

The CDC has found a steady increase in autism diagnosis rates since 2000. Reasons for this are unknown, but may be due to increased awareness.

Autism rates in children have continued their steady rise, surging 30 percent in two years, according to the latest data released Thursday by the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. While 1 in 88 children were estimated to have autism in 2008, public health officials now estimate that 1 in 68 children are on the autism spectrum.
Those statistics are based on the 2010 medical records of 8-year-olds living in 11 communities throughout the United States that are part of the CDC’s autism surveillance network. When the CDC started its surveillance of these communities back in 2000, the incidence of autism was 1 in 150 children.
CDC officials couldn’t offer specific reasons for the rise beyond increased awareness of the condition among doctors, teachers, and parents. “It may be that we’re getting better at identifying autism,” said Coleen Boyle, director of the CDC’s National Center on Birth Defects and Developmental Disabilities, during a press briefing. “We do feel like some of this has to do with how children are identified, diagnosed, and served in their communities.”
Autism advocacy groups noted that the increasing prevalence underscores the need for research funding to identify the causes of autism. “To be perfectly frank, it’s an incomplete picture right now,” said Robert Ring, chief science officer at Autism Speaks, a research advocacy organization in New York City. “All the pieces of the puzzle aren’t in place.”
Certain trends have remained constant during the decade that the CDC has been collecting data. Autism remains five times more common in boys — affecting 1 in 42 compared with 1 in 189 girls — and white children are more likely to be diagnosed than black or Hispanic children, though the prevalence in those minority groups has risen at a faster rate than for whites.
About half of children with autism in 2010 had average or above-average intelligence, compared with a third in 2002.
“We now recognize that autism is a spectrum,” said Marshalyn Yeargin-Allsopp, chief of the CDC’s developmental disabilities branch. “Our understanding has evolved to the point that we understand that there are children with higher IQs who may not have been receiving services in the past.”
The CDC provided grants to 11 states across the country — including Arizona, Arkansas, Maryland, and Wisconsin — based on their ability to survey medical and school records for pediatric autism diagnoses. Massachusetts is not one of the sites providing data to the federal government.
Autism rates varied widely among the 11 areas under CDC surveillance. In Alabama, only 1 in 175 children had autism in 2010 compared with 1 in 45 children in New Jersey.
That difference could reflect varying access to expensive autism assessments and therapies among states. New Jersey mandated in 2010 that insurance companies must cover $36,000 per year in behavioral programs and other autism therapies for any person under age 21 who is diagnosed with the disorder. Alabama didn’t pass a coverage mandate until 2012. A Massachusetts coverage law took effect in 2011, and more than 30 other states instituted such laws as well.
Some children with behavioral or intellectual disabilities other than autism may receive the diagnosis from their doctors in order to qualify them for coverage for treatments that could benefit them too, said Dr. Sarah Spence, codirector of Boston Children Hospital’s Autism Spectrum Center. “Kids may get labeled with autism disorder because that’s the best way for them to get services, but I don’t think this overdiagnosis is a huge piece of the rising incidence.”
More likely, doctors have become more attuned to early signs of autism in toddlers and preschoolers, such as failure to make eye contact, smile, or express emotional attachments to their caregivers. The American Academy of Pediatrics recommends that health care providers conduct autism screening tests at every well-child visit.
“Doctors are getting better at doing these screenings,” Spence said, “to the point where every once in a while, I can happily tell parents that their child’s language delay isn’t autism.”
Despite this increased awareness, the average age at which a child is diagnosed hasn’t budged much; most children aren’t diagnosed until after 4 years of age, according to the CDC, two years after signs of the disorder usually start to appear.
“Research suggests that the earlier we intervene with treatment, the greater the probability that children will realize their full potential,” Ring said.
In an effort to get children diagnosed earlier, the US Department of Health and Human Services revealed an educational campaign on Thursday to make parents, teachers, and health care providers even more aware of early autism signs. Parents are advised to look for certain expected milestones in their child’s development, such as developing a fear of strangers, responding to other people’s emotions, and looking in the mirror by age 6 to 9 months.
One problem, however, that still remains unaddressed is the lack of behavioral specialists to assess and treat the growing population of children displaying signs of autism.

“The wait lists in Boston for assessment and treatment are too long,” Spence said, “and that’s unacceptable because every month counts when it comes to starting therapy.”
Read more here

Friday, March 28, 2014

Rise in autism cases may be due to rising awareness

This article claims that the rise seen in autism cases may be due to rising awareness of the condition.

Young boys continue to have the highest rate of autism diagnoses, but Danish doctors are diagnosing more girls, teenagers and adults with the disorder than they did in the mid-1990s. That's the finding from a 16-year study published 20 February in the Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders.
Many studies look at the prevalence of autism, akin to taking a snapshot of the number of diagnoses in a given population. The new study instead examined the disorder's incidence, or newly reported diagnoses, each year.
Between 1995 and 2010, nearly 15,000 people received a new diagnosis of autism in Denmark, the study found. During that time, the incidence of autism overall increased from 9 diagnoses per 100,000 people to 38.6.
"We know that the incidence rates of autism spectrum disorders have increased in the last two decades, so we weren't actually surprised about the increases," says principal investigator Marlene Lauritsen, associate professor of child and adolescent psychiatry at Aalborg University in Denmark. "But we were surprised about most of the patients we saw the largest increases in."
For instance, the number of males with a new autism diagnosis quadrupled from 13.2 per 100,000 people in 1995 to 58 in 2010. In the same time period, female diagnoses increased sevenfold from 2.6 to 18.6 per 100,000 people.
The greatest increase in incidence among girls came from diagnoses of two subcategories of autism, Asperger syndrome and pervasive developmental disorder-not otherwise specified (PDD-NOS). Both categories are being subsumed into the autism diagnosis in the newest edition of the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual (DSM-5), the American Psychiatric Association's guidelines for diagnosis. And both are generally thought to represent the higher-functioning end of the autism spectrum.
"That is in a way interesting because it goes against the idea that girls are always more severely afflicted [than boys]," says Eric Fombonne, professor of psychiatry at Oregon Health and Science University, who was not involved in the research.
Incidence inquiry:
The researchers examined records from the Danish Psychiatric Central Research Registry, which contains reports on inpatient and outpatient care and diagnoses in Denmark.
To standardize the definition of autism spectrum disorders in the study, the researchers included only people up to 65 years of age who were diagnosed by a doctor using the tenth edition of the International Classification of Diseases, a publication of the World Health Organization and the DSM-5's international counterpart. The ICD-10 was last revised in 1994 and still lists Asperger syndrome and PDD-NOS as diagnoses independent of autism. Its next edition is expected in 2017.
Boys are diagnosed more often than girls and at younger ages, the study found. On average, boys receive a diagnosis at 9 years versus an average of 11 years for girls.
In boys, the sharpest uptick over the study period is in childhood autism -- a subtype of the disorder in which symptoms appear before 3 years of age -- from 2.1 cases for every 100,000 people in 1995 to 17.6 in 2010. Another spike is in rates for PDD-NOS, which increased fivefold to 25.8 per 100,000.
In girls, new cases of PDD-NOS showed the steepest gains, jumping 11-fold from 0.8 cases to 9.3 per 100,000 people. Diagnoses of Asperger syndrome increased from 0.6 cases per 100,000 in 1995 to 5.8 in 2010.
Better diagnostic practices may explain these large hikes in incidence, says Maureen Durkin, professor of population health sciences and pediatrics at the University of Wisconsin in Madison.
"There's much more awareness of autism," say Durkin, who was not involved in the study. "There's much more screening going on. And the newer generation of clinicians are being trained in this so they are more likely to see it."
This increased attention to autism and its symptoms may also explain the rise in diagnoses of teenagers and adults.
An age-stratified analysis shows that children between the ages of 4 and 13 make up about 63 percent of the new autism cases. The fastest acceleration in new cases is in those diagnosed between 14 and 20 years of age.
Individuals diagnosed between 21 and 65 years of age account for about 9 percent of the new cases -- but their proportion also significantly increased over the time frame of the study. Like girls, many of the adults are diagnosed with higher-functioning forms of autism, such as Asperger syndrome and PDD-NOS.
"If the incidence [in adults] is increasing, it just has to do with recognition of cases that have been missed up to that age," Fombonne says. "It cannot be that you develop autism at age 50."
Overall, PDD-NOS diagnoses show steep growth, just behind childhood autism. However, Lauritsen says, PDD-NOS is not as well defined as other autism subtypes such as Asperger syndrome.
"In [PDD-NOS], you can have children that we think are on the border of the autism spectrum," she says. "We could think they are socially impaired, but it's not quite clear that it's autistic behavior."
Individuals diagnosed with PDD-NOS often have social deficits but lack repetitive behaviors, a core symptom of autism. Studies suggest that under DSM-5 guidelines, some people with PDD-NOS would fall into a new category called social communication disorder rather than autism.
Read more here

Girls naturally more protected from autism development

This article explains why boys are four times more likely to develop autism and explains why girls may be naturally more protected from developing autism.

It takes more mutations to trigger autism in women than in men, which may explain why men are four times more likely to have the disorder, according to a study published 26 February in the American Journal of Human Genetics.
The study found that women with autism or developmental delay tend to have more large disruptions in their genomes than do men with the disorder. Inherited mutations are also more likely to be passed down from unaffected mothers than from fathers.
Together, the results suggest that women are resistant to mutations that contribute to autism.
"This strongly argues that females are protected from autism and developmental delay and require more mutational load, or more mutational hits that are severe, in order to push them over the threshold," says lead researcher Evan Eichler, professor of genome sciences at the University of Washington in Seattle. "Males on the other hand are kind of the canary in the mineshaft, so to speak, and they are much less robust."
The findings bolster those from previous studies, but don't explain what confers protection against autism in women. The fact that autism is difficult to diagnose in girls may mean that studies enroll only those girls who are severely affected and who may therefore have the most mutations, researchers note.
"The authors are geneticists, and the genetics is terrific," says David Skuse, professor of behavioral and brain sciences at University College London, who was not involved in the study. "But the questions about ascertainment are not addressed adequately."
Genetic burden:
The new study draws from the Simons Simplex Collection (SSC), a database of families that have one child with autism and unaffected parents and siblings. (This project is funded by the Simons Foundation, SFARI.org's parent organization.) In a 2011 study, researchers found that girls with autism in the SSC tend to have more large duplications or deletions of regions of the genome, called copy number variants (CNVs), than do boys with the disorder, although this disparity does not reach statistical significance2.
For the new study, Eichler and his colleagues cataloged the number of CNVs in 109 girls and 653 boys with autism from the SSC. They found that females are twice as likely as males to carry CNVs that are at least 400 kilobases long. (The larger the CNV, the more likely it is to disrupt important genes.)
When the researchers analyzed only CNVs that encompass risk genes for neurodevelopmental disorders, they found that females with autism are three times as likely as males with the disorder to carry CNVs that encompass these genes.
Females with autism also carry slightly more rare mutations that change a single DNA nucleotide than the men do. These are the "nastiest of nasty mutations," says Eichler, because they interfere with the protein's function.
The researchers saw a similar but smaller effect for CNVs in a larger group of 9,206 males and 6,379 females referred for genetic testing: 75 percent of this group turned out to have developmental delay, intellectual disability or autism.
Women in this group are 1.28 times more likely than men to carry large CNVs that include risk factors for these disorders.
Many autism-linked mutations arise spontaneously, or de novo, and about 80 percent of these come from the father.
Eichler and his colleagues found that women are far more likely than men to transmit the inherited mutations that confer autism risk.
Of the 27 large CNVs the researchers identified in the SSC group, 70 percent, or 19, were inherited from the mother. Mothers had similarly passed down about 57 percent of the 3,561 CNVs detected in the neurodevelopmental group.
Eichler intends to extend this work in a bigger study to assess whether certain mutations are more likely than others to be inherited.
"I think it's really critical to identify these inherited components," he says. "We know they're there, but we need to really focus on identifying the specific genes so we can advise [parents] a little more about recurrence."
However, it's unclear whether this gender bias is the result of genetics or reflects differences in diagnosis or the way females manifest symptoms of the disorder. Girls with autism tend to actively compensate for their symptoms in ways that boys don't, which may account for the discrepancy, says Skuse.
As a result, the females enrolled in studies may tend to be severely affected and carry multiple mutations. "There is some suggestion that higher-functioning females are out there in the general population, but they're not being referred," he says.
The study also does not address why women with autism transmit more mutations, or how they are protected from autism.
"We need to ask what it is about brain development that makes it such that females are protected -- because ultimately that is what we want know," says Aravinda Chakravarti, director of the Center for Complex Disease Genomics at the Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine in Baltimore. "We need to re-create that developmental environment."
The most obvious explanation for autism's gender bias is that because men have only one X chromosome, they are hypersensitive to mutations in this chromosome. In line with this theory, several autism-linked genes are located on the X chromosome. However, most of the mutations that show a gender bias in the new study are not on the X chromosome, suggesting that other factors must be involved.
This article has been modified from the original. An earlier version incorrectly stated that 80 percent of the genetic risk factors for autism arise spontaneously. The exact contribution of spontaneous genetic variants to autism is not known.
Read more here

Thursday, March 13, 2014

DNA may explain why more boys are affected by autism than girls

A study that looks at genetics and DNA to determine why more boys are affected by autism than girls are.

A new DNA study begins to explain why girls are less likely than boys to have an autism spectrum disorder.
It turns out that girls tend not to develop autism when only mild genetic abnormalities exist, the researchers said. But when they are diagnosed with the disorder, they are more likely to have more extreme genetic mutations than boys who show the same symptoms.
"Girls tolerate neurodevelopmental mutations more than boys do. This is really what the study shows," said study author Sebastien Jacquemont, an assistant professor of genetic medicine at the University Hospital of Lausanne, in Switzerland.
"To push a girl over the threshold for autism or any of these neurodevelopmental disorders, it takes more of these mutations," Jacquemont added. "It's about resilience to genetic insult."
The dilemma is that the researchers don't really know why this is so. "It's more of an observation at a molecular level," Jacquemont noted.
In the study, the Swiss researchers collaborated with scientists from the University of Washington School of Medicine to analyze about 16,000 DNA samples and sequencing data sets from people with neurodevelopmental disorders, including autism spectrum disorders.
The investigators also analyzed genetic data from almost 800 families affected by autism for the study, which was released online Feb. 27 in the American Journal of Human Genetics.
The researchers analyzed copy-number variants (CNVs), which are individual variations in the number of copies of a particular gene. They also looked at single-nucleotide variants (SNVs), which are DNA sequence variations affecting a single nucleotide. Nucleotides are the basic building blocks of DNA.
The study found that females diagnosed with any neurodevelopmental disorder, including attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder and intellectual disability, had more harmful CNVs than males who were diagnosed with the same disorder. Females with autism also had more harmful SNVs than males with the condition.
"There's a well-known disparity when it comes to developmental disorders between boys and girls, and it's been puzzling," Jacquemont said. "And there have been quite a bit of papers trying to investigate this bias that we've seen in the clinic."
The study authors pointed out that autism affects four boys for every one girl. The ratio increases to seven-to-one when looking at high-functioning autism cases.
It's an interesting study, said Dr. Andrew Adesman, chief of developmental and behavioral pediatrics at the Steven & Alexandra Cohen Children's Medical Center of New York.
"It's not an easy study to read, but certainly the take-away suggests it tries to lend further support to the assumption that the ratio of males to females [who have autism] is affected by genetic vulnerabilities -- that it has a genetic underpinning," Adesman said.
What do the findings mean for parents and patients?
Adesman said there are no immediate benefits, but the knowledge can help direct future research.
"This isn't going to lead to a breakthrough in treatment, but from a clinical standpoint it may help researchers and academics understand why it is that developmental disorders seem to be more common in boys than girls," he noted.
The new research also reinforces that genetic differences -- or vulnerabilities -- aren't limited to sex chromosomes, Adesman added.
"The presumption has been, 'Well gee, boys have a Y chromosome and girls don't, so are there problems with the Y chromosome that explain it?'" Adesman noted.
"The bottom line is that there are a lot of different genetic abnormalities and atypicalities that result in developmental disorders in children and adults," Adesman explained. "Women seem to be a little more resilient in terms of being able to have minor abnormalities without having a developmental problem."
Jacquemont agreed that the team's discovery opens the door for new avenues of study.
The findings provide ideas "for deciphering the issue further," said Jacquemont. "One study that might be helpful would be trying to understand what are the symptoms that appear a lot faster in males than females. There are a lot of alleys that could be explored."
Read more here

Saturday, January 04, 2014

Autistic boys get less sleep with media in bedrooms

A study shows that media screens in the bedroom of autistic boys resulted in them getting significantly less sleep.

For boys with autism, having easy access to media in the bedroom is linked to significantly less sleep, according to researchers from the University of Missouri.

Previous research has shown that bedroom access to screen-based media is associated with less time spent sleeping in the general population,” said Christopher Engelhardt, Ph.D., a postdoctoral research fellow at the MU Thompson Center for Autism and Developmental Disorders and the MU School of Health Professions.

“We found that this relationship is stronger among boys with autism.

“Our current results were cross-sectional, meaning that we are not able to determine whether pre-bedtime media exposure causes some children with autism to sleep less,” he said.

“However, the relationship between bedroom media access and sleep was particularly large among boys with autism, suggesting that we should continue to carefully research this possibility.”

For the study, researchers looked at the relationship between media use and sleep among boys with autism compared to typically developing boys or boys with attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder (ADHD).

Parents of the boys in each group were surveyed regarding the child’s hours of media use each day, bedroom access to media and the average hours of sleep they received per night. The findings revealed a link between bedroom access to a television or computer and reduced sleep among boys with autism.

Furthermore, average video-game exposure was connected to less time spent sleeping among the boys with ASD.

“Even though our findings are preliminary, parents should be aware that media use may have an effect on sleep, especially for children with autism,” Engelhardt said. “If children are having sleep problems, parents might consider monitoring and possibly limiting their children’s media use, especially around bedtime.”

Engelhardt says future research should investigate the processes by which bedroom access to media could contribute to sleep disturbances in children with autism spectrum disorder (ASD).

“It is also important to note that some media use may also be beneficial for children with autism,” Engelhardt said. “Future research is also needed to determine how video games and other technologies may be helpful in teaching and reinforcing skills and behaviors.”

It is estimated that about one in 88 children have ASD, which is characterized by social and communication difficulties as well as repetitive behaviors.

Sleep problems are very common in children with autism, and this may be due to a variety of underlying causes. Media use may worsen some of these underlying factors, and it appears to be an area for future research, Engelhardt said.

Read more here