Saturday, March 11, 2017

EEG Neuro - Diagnostic Technician Houston - Make a Difference Every Day

Make a Difference Every Day

Open Position –  EEG/Neuro -Diagnostic Technician HOUSTON TX

Send resume and cover letter to this EMAIL

EEG Technician - Pediatric  FT or PT

Houston Specialty Clinic - Houston, TX

Performs electroencephalograph (EEG) testing under supervision, for (mostly) pediatric patients.

Job Duties
  • Attaches and connects electrodes between specified body areas and EEG machine.
  • Performs prescribed testing. Reviews patient's history and educates patient about procedure.
  • Monitors and patient's condition and responds to and reports any adverse reactions.
  • Identifies and corrects for artifacts. Edits and forwards results to attending physician for analysis and interpretation.
  • Scores/graphs, reviews, analyzes, documents, and reports results of diagnostic procedures.
  • High School diploma or GED
  • Basic Life Support (BLS) through the American Heart Association or the American Red Cross CPR for the Professional Rescuer with card in-hand before start date, and current AHA BLS must be good through sixty days of hire.
Preferred Qualifications
  • Associate's Degree
  • Strong EEG experience
  • Registered EEG Tech
  • Experience with Pediatrics.
Job Type: Full-time or Part time
Job Location:
  • Houston, TX 77024
Required education:
  • High school or equivalent
Required experience:
  • eeg technician work: 2 years
  • Comparable polysomnographic experience may considered

Monday, March 06, 2017

Mobile phones cancer-causing? Only if you use them over 10 years, we think... maybe...

Do Cell Phones Cause Cancer? 
If you use the for over 10 might increase risk 33%? Really?  Who will be using their phone for less than 10 years?

Cochrane level meta-analyses are very strong from a data perspective.  

Until there is more data, it seems reasonable to use hand free systems or headphones to keep the phone away from the head. 

As an aside, industry funding did not bias studies.

- JR

Mobile phone use and risk of brain tumours: a systematic review of association between study quality, source of funding, and research outcomes


Authors Manya Prasad Prachi Kathuria Pallavi Nair Amit Kumar Kameshwar Prasad

Original Article
First Online: 17 February 2017
DOI: 10.1007/s10072-017-2850-8
Cite this article as:
Prasad, M., Kathuria, P., Nair, P. et al. Neurol Sci (2017). doi:10.1007/s10072-017-2850-8


Mobile phones emit electromagnetic radiations that are classified as possibly carcinogenic to humans. Evidence for increased risk for brain tumours accumulated in parallel by epidemiologic investigations remains controversial. This paper aims to investigate whether methodological quality of studies and source of funding can explain the variation in results. PubMed and Cochrane CENTRAL searches were conducted from 1966 to December 2016, which was supplemented with relevant articles identified in the references.

Twenty-two case control studies were included for systematic review. Meta-analysis of 14 case–control studies showed practically no increase in risk of brain tumour [OR 1.03 (95% CI 0.92–1.14)]. However, for mobile phone use of 10 years or longer (or >1640 h), the overall result of the meta-analysis showed a significant 1.33 times increase in risk.

The summary estimate of government funded as well as phone industry funded studies showed 1.07 times increase in odds which was not significant, while mixed funded studies did not show any increase in risk of brain tumour.

Metaregression analysis indicated that the association was significantly associated with methodological study quality (p < 0.019, 95% CI 0.009–0.09).

Relationship between source of funding and log OR for each study was not statistically significant (p < 0.32, 95% CI 0.036–0.010).

We found evidence linking mobile phone use and risk of brain tumours especially in long-term users (≥10 years).

Studies with higher quality showed a trend towards high risk of brain tumour, while lower quality showed a trend towards lower risk/protection.